Italy seized 73 million counterfeit items at its borders in 2022, consistently ranking among the EU's top three jurisdictions for customs enforcement. Behind those numbers are thousands of foreign brand owners whose intellectual property was being copied, diluted, or exploited in the Italian market — many of whom did not know what enforcement tools were available or how quickly they could act.
The challenge for foreign brand owners is not knowing the Italian enforcement system exists — it is knowing which of four available routes fits their specific situation, what timeline and cost to expect, and — critically — what the counter-risk is if their trademark has not been genuinely used in Italy for the last five years. That counter-risk, the non-use revocation defense under Art. 24 CPI, is the most commonly deployed weapon by accused infringers and the one most foreign brand owners fail to anticipate.
This guide maps the complete Italian trademark infringement enforcement roadmap: from cease-and-desist letter through EU customs seizure, with realistic timelines and legal fee ranges — including the non-use revocation defense and the criminal enforcement route under Art. 473-474 of the Italian Penal Code.
Company Italy's Milan IP lawyers advise foreign brand owners on trademark registration, cease-and-desist proceedings, and preliminary injunction applications before Italy's specialized commercial courts.
Note: This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Contact our IP team for advice on your specific situation.
Trademark Infringement in Italy: The Legal Framework
Italian trademark law is codified in the CPI — Codice della Proprietà Industriale (D.Lgs. 30/2005, Italy's industrial property code). The CPI was last significantly amended by D.Lgs. 15/2019, which fully aligned Italian trademark law with EU Trademark Directive 2015/2436. Italy's trademark protection system is robust, well-developed, and — through its network of specialized commercial courts — substantially faster than ordinary Italian civil litigation.
The infringement standard: Art. 20 CPI defines trademark infringement as the unauthorized use of an identical or confusingly similar sign for identical or similar goods or services without the rights holder's consent. Art. 22 CPI applies the likelihood of confusion test, evaluating mark similarity and goods/services similarity together — a well-known or reputed mark receives protection beyond its registered classes, covering situations where use of the similar mark would take unfair advantage of or be detrimental to the distinctive character or reputation of the registered mark.
Two bases for enforcement in Italy:
Registered trademark (UIBM or EUIPO): Action under Art. 20 CPI provides the strongest enforcement position — a presumption of validity, the widest range of remedies, and access to the customs seizure mechanism under EU Regulation 608/2013. This is the preferred basis for enforcement wherever possible.
Unregistered rights: Art. 2598 of the Civil Code (unfair competition) provides an enforcement basis for brands with distinctive character in Italy even without formal trademark registration. The evidentiary burden is significantly higher — the rights holder must demonstrate prior use, distinctive character, and consumer confusion — but the right exists and is actionable.
Specialized commercial courts: Italy has 22 Sezioni Specializzate in Materia di Impresa (specialized business sections, established under D.Lgs. 168/2003) with exclusive jurisdiction over IP cases. These courts are located in all major Italian cities, with Milan being the most active for IP litigation. The specialized judges have dedicated IP expertise and process IP cases substantially faster than the ordinary Italian civil courts — a preliminary injunction application can receive a decision in 7–30 days.
Registration: UIBM vs. EUIPO — Which Protects You in Italy?
Before analyzing enforcement options, it is worth understanding the registration landscape — because the strength of your enforcement position depends directly on where and how you registered.
| Route | Coverage | Fee (1 class) | Timeline | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UIBM (Italian Patent & Trademark Office) | Italy only | €101 online + €34 per additional class | 12–18 months | Italy-specific brand with no EU plans |
| EUIPO (EU Intellectual Property Office) | All 27 EU member states including Italy | €850 + €50 (2nd class) + €150 per class | 5–7 months | Most foreign brands entering Italy |
| WIPO Madrid System | Designate Italy or EU via single application | Varies by designation | 12–18 months | Global portfolio management |
EUIPO is the practical choice for most foreign brands entering Italy. A single EUIPO registration covers all 27 EU member states — including Italy — with a faster timeline (5–7 months vs. 12–18 months via UIBM) and significantly broader geographic protection for comparable initial cost. For enforcement purposes, an EUIPO registration provides the same Art. 20 CPI infringement claim rights in Italy as a UIBM registration.
UIBM-only registration is typically justified only when the brand is exclusively Italian with no EU expansion plans, or when additional Italian territorial protection is desired alongside an existing EUIPO registration.
Registration matters critically for enforcement: A registered mark (UIBM or EUIPO) enables Art. 20 CPI infringement claims, EUIPO opposition proceedings against conflicting applications, and customs seizure applications under EU Regulation 608/2013. Unregistered rights require a substantially higher evidentiary burden under Art. 2598 Civil Code.
For the specific registration process and class strategy for Italian or EU trademark registration, see our trademark registration guide.
The Enforcement Roadmap: Four Routes to Stopping Infringement
Italy offers four distinct enforcement mechanisms for trademark rights holders. The right choice depends on the urgency, the scale of the infringement, the infringer's sophistication, and whether the priority is immediate cessation or maximum damages recovery.
| Route | Timeline | Approximate Legal Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cease-and-desist letter (diffida) | Days | €1,500–€5,000 | First step for all cases; effective for unintentional infringers |
| Preliminary injunction (Art. 126 CPI + Art. 700 CPC) | 7–30 days | €5,000–€20,000 | Immediate cessation order; most powerful fast-track tool |
| Customs seizure (EU Reg. 608/2013) | Days to weeks | €1,000–€3,000 + legal | Counterfeit goods imports; Italy is a top-3 EU enforcement jurisdiction |
| Full civil litigation | 2–5 years | €15,000–€80,000+ | Infringer contests; seeking substantial damages award |
Route 1: Cease-and-desist letter (diffida)
The starting point for virtually every trademark enforcement action. A formal written demand from an Italian IP lawyer setting out the infringement, demanding immediate cessation, quantifying the damages exposure, and proposing settlement terms (typically: stop using the mark, destroy infringing materials, compensate rights holder). The diffida creates a formal legal record of notice — important for establishing the infringer's bad faith in subsequent proceedings. It is frequently effective against smaller or unintentional infringers who genuinely did not know about the mark.
Route 2: Preliminary injunction (Art. 126 CPI + Art. 700 CPC)
The most powerful fast-track enforcement tool in Italy. An Italian IP lawyer files an urgent application with the relevant Sezione Specializzata, demonstrating: urgency (delay would cause irreparable harm) and prima facie infringement (the registered mark is clearly being infringed). The court can order immediate cessation of the infringing activity, seizure of all infringing goods and promotional materials, and destruction of infringing items — all without waiting for a full trial. Decisions are typically issued within 7–30 days. Legal cost: €5,000–€20,000 depending on complexity. This is the preferred route when the cease-and-desist has been ignored, the infringement is severe, or speed is critical.
Route 3: Customs seizure (EU Reg. 608/2013)
File an application with Italian Customs (Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli) to authorize detention of suspected counterfeit goods at Italian borders. Italy seized 73 million counterfeit items in 2022 — one of Europe's most active customs enforcement jurisdictions. Once an application is approved, customs officers can act within days to detain shipments. Particularly effective against counterfeit goods manufactured abroad and imported into Italy through major ports (Genoa, Naples, Trieste). Legal cost for the customs application: €1,000–€3,000 plus ongoing legal support.
Route 4: UIBM opposition
When the infringer has filed or is filing a trademark application at UIBM or EUIPO, a formal opposition can be filed within 3 months of the application's publication. Timeline: 12–24 months for resolution. Cost-effective compared to court litigation. This route prevents the infringer from obtaining registration of the conflicting mark — a crucial defensive step, but it does not stop existing infringing use.
Damages and Remedies Under Italian IP Law
A successful trademark enforcement action in Italy can yield a comprehensive package of remedies under Arts. 124–126 CPI.
Civil remedies available (Art. 124 CPI):
- Injunction (inibitoria): A permanent court order stopping all further infringing activity
- Seizure (sequestro): Confiscation of all infringing goods, packaging, and marketing materials
- Destruction (distruzione): Of all infringing goods and the tools used to manufacture them
- Asset freeze (Art. 126 CPI): To preserve assets against which a future damages award can be enforced
- Publication of judgment: At the infringer's expense in national newspapers — a powerful reputational remedy for systematic infringers
Damages (Art. 125 CPI) — three alternative calculation methods:
The plaintiff may choose whichever of these three methods produces the most favorable result:
- Actual losses: Lost sales, price erosion, brand damage, market share loss attributable to the infringement
- Infringer's profits: The total profits the infringer generated from the infringing activity — useful when the infringer's profits exceed the plaintiff's direct losses
- Reasonable royalty: A deemed license fee — the amount the infringer should have paid for a license to use the mark. The plaintiff does NOT need to prove actual economic loss to use this method — making it highly practical for foreign brand owners with no direct Italian sales history
Bad-faith multiplier: For deliberate or repeat infringers, Italian specialized courts can award damages above actual losses — an element increasingly applied post-D.Lgs. 15/2019 against systematic counterfeiters.
Cost recovery: Under Italian civil procedure, the losing party bears the winning party's legal costs — a significant deterrent against frivolous defenses and an important factor in the plaintiff's risk-reward calculation.
Criminal Enforcement and the Non-Use Revocation Risk
Two critical topics that many enforcement guides miss: the criminal enforcement route — which is often the most effective weapon against organized counterfeiters — and the non-use revocation defense, which is the most dangerous counter-weapon a plaintiff can face.
Criminal enforcement (Arts. 473–474 Codice Penale):
Italy's Penal Code criminalizes counterfeiting and fraudulent use of trademarks and distinctive signs. Penalties include up to 3 years imprisonment plus fines. The criminal route is initiated by the trademark owner filing a querela (formal criminal complaint) with the police or the Guardia di Finanza (Italy's financial police, which has specialist IP enforcement units).
Once filed, the criminal investigation proceeds independently — the Guardia di Finanza has broad investigative powers to force disclosure of supplier networks, distribution chains, and financial flows. This makes the criminal route particularly effective against organized counterfeit goods manufacturing and distribution operations, where civil proceedings would only reach the last link in the chain. Criminal and civil proceedings run in parallel — you do not need to choose one over the other.
The criminal route is less appropriate for brand confusion cases (where the infringer may not have acted fraudulently) and more appropriate for systematic counterfeiting operations producing and distributing fake goods at scale.
Non-use revocation warning (Art. 24 CPI):
If the trademark owner has not put their mark to genuine use in Italy for five consecutive years, the infringer can file a counterclaim for revocation of the plaintiff's trademark on grounds of non-use. This is a commonly deployed defensive weapon — the accused infringer argues that the plaintiff's mark should be revoked for non-use, effectively neutralizing the entire enforcement action.
Before filing any enforcement proceedings, always conduct a pre-litigation audit of your own genuine use record in Italy:
- Sales records, invoices, and commercial contracts showing Italian sales or active marketing activity
- Marketing materials, advertising spend, and online presence demonstrating Italian-market activity
- Any single genuine commercial transaction per year in Italy may suffice to establish use — but the use must be real, not token
This is one area where early advice from an Italian IP lawyer is genuinely non-negotiable. Discovering the non-use issue after filing proceedings — when the infringer raises it as a defense — is far more costly than addressing it beforehand.
For the relationship between trademark registration and domain disputes involving your brand in Italy, see our dedicated domain dispute guide.
FAQ
Q: How do I register a trademark in Italy?
Most foreign brands register at EUIPO (EU Intellectual Property Office) — a single registration covering all 27 EU member states including Italy, for €850 (1 class) with a 5–7 month timeline. Alternatively, register at UIBM (Italy's Patent and Trademark Office) for €101 online (1 class) — Italian territory only, 12–18 months. The WIPO Madrid System allows designating Italy or the EU via a single international application.
Q: What is the difference between UIBM and EUIPO trademark registration?
UIBM registration covers Italy only (€101 online per class, 12–18 months timeline). EUIPO registration covers all 27 EU member states including Italy (€850 for the first class, 5–7 months timeline). Most foreign brands entering Italy register at EUIPO for broader, faster, and more cost-effective EU-wide protection. Both provide equivalent enforcement rights under Art. 20 CPI within Italian territory.
Q: What are the penalties for trademark infringement in Italy?
Civil penalties under Arts. 124–125 CPI include injunctions, seizure and destruction of infringing goods and materials, and damages calculated as actual losses, infringer's profits, or a reasonable royalty — plaintiff chooses whichever is most favorable. Criminal penalties under Arts. 473–474 Codice Penale include up to 3 years imprisonment and fines for counterfeiting and fraudulent use of trademarks.
Q: How long does trademark enforcement take in Italy?
A cease-and-desist letter can be issued within days. A preliminary injunction under Art. 126 CPI can be granted in 7–30 days by the Sezione Specializzata. Customs seizure applications under EU Reg. 608/2013 take days to weeks for initial action. UIBM or EUIPO opposition proceedings take 12–24 months. Full civil litigation takes 2–5 years.
Q: Can I enforce trademark rights in Italy without registering in Italy?
Yes, but with meaningful limitations. An unregistered brand can be enforced under Art. 2598 Civil Code (unfair competition) if it has distinctive character in Italy and the infringer creates consumer confusion — but the evidentiary burden is significantly higher than for a registered mark, customs seizure is not available, and the remedies may be more limited. A registered EUIPO or UIBM trademark provides substantially stronger and faster enforcement options.
Q: What is the five-year non-use revocation rule in Italy and how does it affect enforcement?
Under Art. 24 CPI, if a trademark owner has not put the mark to genuine commercial use in Italy for five consecutive years, any party with a legitimate interest can file a revocation action to cancel the registration. In infringement proceedings, the accused infringer regularly files a counterclaim for revocation on non-use grounds as a defensive strategy. Before initiating any enforcement action in Italy, conduct a pre-litigation audit of your Italian use record — invoices, marketing materials, and commercial activity — to confirm the mark has been genuinely used within the past five years.
Q: How much does a preliminary injunction application cost in Italy?
A preliminary injunction (Art. 126 CPI combined with Art. 700 CPC) filed before a Sezione Specializzata in Materia di Impresa typically costs €5,000–€20,000 in legal fees depending on the complexity of the case and the court's workload. The application is filed without prior notice to the infringer (inaudita altera parte) when delay would cause irreparable harm; the court can grant the order in 7–30 days. Court fees (contributo unificato) are separate and typically €450–€1,500 depending on the declared value of the claim.
Q: Can Italian customs seize counterfeit goods without a court order?
Yes. Under EU Regulation 608/2013, a trademark owner files a customs application (Application for Action) with Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli. Once approved — typically within 30 working days — Italian customs officers can detain shipments of suspected counterfeit goods for up to 10 days without a court order, notifying the rights holder who can then initiate legal proceedings. Italy seized 73 million counterfeit items in 2022, making it one of Europe's most active customs enforcement jurisdictions. The customs application is separate from trademark registration but requires a valid registered mark.
Q: What is a diffida in Italian trademark law?
A diffida (cease-and-desist letter) is a formal written demand from an Italian IP lawyer asserting the trademark infringement, identifying the specific infringing acts, demanding immediate cessation and destruction of infringing materials, and quantifying the damages exposure. The diffida creates a formal legal record establishing that the infringer was notified — which is important evidence of bad faith in subsequent civil or criminal proceedings. Legal cost: €1,500–€5,000. Many smaller or unintentional infringers settle at the diffida stage, making it the required first step in virtually every enforcement action.
Q: Is criminal prosecution possible for trademark infringement in Italy?
Yes. Arts. 473–474 of the Italian Penal Code criminalize counterfeiting and fraudulent use of industrial property rights including trademarks. Penalties include up to 3 years imprisonment and fines. The trademark owner files a querela (formal criminal complaint) with the police or Guardia di Finanza, triggering an independent criminal investigation. The Guardia di Finanza's IP enforcement units have broad investigative powers to uncover supplier networks and financial flows — making the criminal route particularly effective against organized counterfeit manufacturing and distribution operations. Criminal and civil proceedings can run simultaneously.
Q: What damages can be awarded in Italian trademark infringement litigation?
Under Art. 125 CPI, the plaintiff can choose the most favorable of three calculation methods: (1) actual losses including lost sales, price erosion, and brand damage; (2) the infringer's profits attributable to the infringing activity; or (3) a reasonable royalty — the fee the infringer should have paid to use the mark under a license. The reasonable royalty method is particularly useful for foreign brand owners with limited Italian sales history, as it does not require proof of direct economic loss. For deliberate or repeat infringers, courts can award damages above actual losses. The losing party typically bears the winning party's legal costs.
Start the Right Enforcement Strategy
Italian trademark enforcement offers foreign brand owners four routes — from cease-and-desist to customs seizure — with specialized commercial courts handling IP cases in all major Italian cities. The preliminary injunction is the most powerful fast-track tool, capable of stopping infringement within weeks. The criminal route via Arts. 473–474 Codice Penale is the most effective instrument against organized counterfeit operations. Before acting on any route, verify your own genuine use record — the Art. 24 CPI five-year non-use revocation rule is a commonly deployed infringer defense that can transform a plaintiff into a defendant.
The right enforcement strategy depends on the infringement type, the infringer's scale and sophistication, and whether a valid Italian trademark registration is already in place. Our IP legal team assesses all these factors before advising on the optimal enforcement route.
Our Milan IP lawyers file trademark applications, issue cease-and-desist letters, and manage preliminary injunction proceedings for foreign brand owners — contact Company Italy.
Milan: Via Monte Napoleone 8, 20121 Milano — +39 02 8088 1240 Rome: Via del Corso 184, 00186 Roma — +39 06 4520 7330 Florence: Via de' Tornabuoni 17, 50123 Firenze — +39 055 264 8120 Email: info@company-italy.com
This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Contact our Italian legal team for guidance specific to your situation.